History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Zold
110 N.J. Super. 33
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1970
|
Check Treatment
110 N.J. Super. 33 (1970)
264 A.2d 257

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DOUGLAS ZOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 13, 1970.
Decided April 24, 1970.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N.J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).

All other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion (unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Zold
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Apr 24, 1970
Citation: 110 N.J. Super. 33
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.