State v. Zold

Apr 24, 1970
Reporters:
,
Before:
Conford, Collester, Kolovsky (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons ‍​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N.J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).

All other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion ‍​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‍(unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.

Judgment affirmed.