State v. Zeek

Jan 13, 1939
Versions:3 A.2d 574
121 N.J.L. 584
1939 N.J. LEXIS 280
Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -None.