History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Wright
98 Ohio St. 3d 1212
Ohio
2003
Check Treatment

{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is want of a conflict.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cooney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent. Colleen Conway Cooney, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J. Carol A. Wright, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk A. Lindsey, Associate Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Attorney General of Ohio. David L. Doughten and Paul Skendelas, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Wright
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 9, 2003
Citation: 98 Ohio St. 3d 1212
Docket Number: No. 2002-0234
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.