History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Wray
124 Mo. 542
Mo.
1894
Check Treatment
Sherwood, J.

Indicted for grand larceny, the defendant was convicted of that ofíense and appeals to this court.

The indictment is sufficient. The evidence has been preserved in the bill of exceptions, but inasmuch as the motion for a new trial has not been preserved in the bill, nor preserved in the record and called for in the bill, the clerk being directed to copy the same, we can not look into any exceptions taken nor into the evidence adduced. R. S. 1889, sec. 2304; State v. Griffin, 98 Mo. 672.

As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Wray
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Nov 5, 1894
Citation: 124 Mo. 542
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.