State v. Worley

May 1, 1957
Reporters:
, ,
Per Curiam.

The record contains numerous exceptions. However, they have not been brought forward ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‍and assigned as error, as required by Rule 19, Section 3 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 221 N.C. 554; Investment Co. v. ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‍Chemicals Laboratory, 233 N.C. 294, 63 S.E. 2d 637.

The appellant does have what purports to be assignments of error, but none of them is supported by ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‍an exception. This Court will not search through a record in an effort to determine whether or not it contains an exception or exceptions ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‍that will sustain assignments of error. Cecil v. Lumber Co., 197 N.C. 81, 147 S.E. 735.

We have examined the record. The verdict supports the judgment and no ‍‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‍error of law appears on the face of the record. Judgment affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.