| Minn. | Nov 28, 1892
Though the evidence in the case was not so full and satisfactory as might be desired, there was enough to make it a question for the jury whether the way in controversy had become a public highway, either by common-law dedication, or, under the statute, by continuous user for the period prescribed.
Order affirmed.
(Opinion published 53 N.W. 759" date_filed="1892-11-28" court="Minn." case_name="State v. Woll">53 N. W. Rep. 759.)