History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Winstead
74 Ohio St. 3d 277
Ohio
1996
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We agree that a courier’s delay in delivery is not “good cause” for accepting an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening that is untimely filed. Moreover, there is. no denial of due process or equal protection in applying to this appellant a rule applicable to all appellants.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Winstead
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 10, 1996
Citation: 74 Ohio St. 3d 277
Docket Number: No. 95-816
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.