80 N.J.L. 467 | N.J. | 1910
The opinion of the Supreme Court deals with the questions therein discussed in a satisfactory manner. It is, however, urged that the court failed to consider the question whether, under an indictment charging the defendant with the use of instruments to procure a miscarriage, he could be convicted if he did not actually participate in the use of the instrument
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, JJ. 9.
For reversal—Rone.