State v. Wilson

Apr 19, 2007
2007-UP-184

PER CURIAM: Bernard Wilson appeals his guilty plea to drawing and uttering a fraudulent check in excess of $1,000. Wilson argues the trial judge failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), in accepting his plea. After a thorough review of the record and counsel‘s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss1 Wilson‘s appeal and grant counsel‘s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, KITTREDGE, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

Notes

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.