History
  • No items yet
midpage
326 Conn. 920
Conn.
2017

The defendant's petitions for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 167 Conn.App. 744, 164 A.3d 9 (2016), and 173 Conn.App. 64, 164 A.3d 31 (2017), is granted, limited to the following questions:

"1. Under the Connecticut constitution, article first, §§ 8 and 9, are all juveniles entitled to a sentencing proceeding at which the court expressly considers the youth related factors required by the United States constitution for cases involving juveniles who have been sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of release? See Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) ?

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative and a sentencing court does not comply with the sentencing requirements under the Connecticut constitution, does parole eligibility under General Statutes § 54-125a (f) adequately remedy any state constitutional violation?"

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams-Bey
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jul 10, 2017
Citations: 326 Conn. 920; 169 A.3d 793; 2017 Conn. LEXIS 230
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In