midpage

State v. WilliamsState v. Williams

Louisiana Court of Appeal
Dec 10, 1997
No. 30090-KA
Versions:704 So. 2d 403
1997 WL 771878
1997 La. App. LEXIS 2818
MARVIN, Chief Judge.

The State originally charged Sylvester Williams with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, La.R.S. 40:967(A). After Williams bargained to enter an Alford plea of guilty to a lesser charge of possession of cocaine, La.R.S. 40:967(C), the trial court pronounced a “sentence at hard labor not to exceed five years.”

Williams appeals, complaining that his sentence is indeterminate and excessive. The court minutes and a written “judgment” later signed by the court state that Williams was sentenced to five years at hard labor. La.C.Cr.P. art. 871 does not mention a written judgment, but requires that the sentence shall be pronounced orally in open court and recorded in the minutes. The oral pronouncement in the transcript prevails over the minutes. State v. Taylor, 28,736 (La. App.2d Cir. 10/30/96), 682 So.2d 827.

Agreeing that the sentence is an indeterminate sentence, we pretermit consideration of the excessive sentence claim, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing according to law. La.C.Cr.P. art. 879 requires a determinate sentence. Upon resen-tencing, the trial court shall inform Williams on the record of the prescriptive period for applying for post conviction relief. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8.

DECREE

Indeterminate sentence is vacated. Remanded for resentencing.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 10, 1997
Citations: 704 So. 2d 403; 1997 WL 771878; 1997 La. App. LEXIS 2818; No. 30090-KA
Docket Number: No. 30090-KA
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In