443 P.2d 612 | Or. | 1968
Defendant was convicted of knowingly uttering and publishing a forged bank check, and appeals. The
Defendant complains only because evidence was received that earlier on the same day he cashed at another store another check identical in all particulars except that it bore No. 4642. There is no merit in defendant’s contention. The evidence objected to was admissible to prove criminal intent. State v. Holbert, 242 Or 228, 408 P2d 941 (1965); State v. Cruse, 231 Or 326, 333, 372 P2d 974 (1962), and earlier cases therein cited.
The judgment is affirmed.