midpage

State v. WilliamsState v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals
Oct 14, 1997
No. 71166
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Crane

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Louis Williams, Defendant, appeals from his jury conviction for first degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err in allowing certain arguments by the prosecuting attorney. Rule 29.12(b). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 14, 1997
Citations: 954 S.W.2d 15; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1774; 1997 WL 629934; No. 71166
Docket Number: No. 71166
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In