History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Williams
166 Wash. 704
Wash.
1932
Check Treatment

ON REHEARING.
After full consideration on rehearing En Banc, we are of the opinion that the conviction and sentence on the third count in the information, is not sustained by any evidence of guilt of the charge.

The judgment and sentence upon the third count is therefore reversed and set aside. To that extent, the decision in 163 Wash. 419,1 P.2d 307, is modified.

The judgment and sentence on the first count is well supported by competent evidence, and we find that the errors assigned respecting that charge and conviction are not well taken.

The judgment and sentence upon count one remains in full force and effect, undisturbed by this decision. State v. McCourt,157 Wash. 499, 289 P. 41.

Appellant, having obtained a more favorable judgment here, will recover costs of appeal.

All concur.

*Page 1

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 17, 1932
Citation: 166 Wash. 704
Docket Number: No. 23137. En Banc.
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.