State v. WilliamsState v. Williams
Defendant was convicted of having incited and participated in a riot in which the death of a person occurred,
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2
In this assignment, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a change of venue. The record of the hearing on the motion presents issues substantially similar to those we considered in State v. Bell, 346 So.2d 1090 (La.1977). Here, as in Bell, the testimony taken as a whole does not support defendant‘s contention that the trial judge abused his sound discretion in refusing the change of venue. State v. Berry, 329 So.2d 728 (La.1976); State v. Wilkerson, 326 So.2d 353 (La.1976); State v. Stewart, 325 So.2d 819 (La.1976). Therefore, we find that defendant‘s first assignment of error lacks merit.
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 4
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash on the basis of the unconstitutionality of
Defendant‘s conviction and sentence are affirmed.