History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Williams
379 A.2d 233
| N.J. | 1977
|
Check Treatment
75 N.J. 1 (1977)
379 A.2d 233

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ISAAC WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 18, 1977.
Decided November 2, 1977.

Mr. Michael R. Klekman, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Philip B. Seaton, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Thomas B. Shusted, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Robert E. Rochford, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

*2 For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 2, 1977
Citation: 379 A.2d 233
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.