midpage

State v. WilhelmState v. Wilhelm

Ohio Supreme Court
Apr 22, 1998
No. 97-1054
Versions:81 Ohio St. 3d 444
692 N.E.2d 181

Lead Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 665 N.E.2d 1091.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.





Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinión in Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 12-13. 665 N.E.2d 1091, 1098.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Wilhelm
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 22, 1998
Citations: 81 Ohio St. 3d 444; 692 N.E.2d 181; No. 97-1054
Docket Number: No. 97-1054
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In