History
  • No items yet
midpage
628 A.2d 287
N.J.
1993

Dissenting Opinion

WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s dissenting opinion, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

For affirmance — Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O’HERN and STEIN-4

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and HANDLER and GARIBALDI — 3






Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Whyte
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Aug 2, 1993
Citations: 628 A.2d 287; 133 N.J. 481; 1993 N.J. LEXIS 740
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In