History
  • No items yet
midpage
51 Ohio St. 3d 121
Ohio
1990

Lead Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals ‍​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‍is affirmed on authority of State v. Murphy (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 206, 551 N.E. 2d 932, for the reasons stated in Murphy and not for the reasons stated by the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas, Wright ‍​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‍and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.





Dissenting Opinion

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. I believe that on the record ‍​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‍in this case, our holding in State v. Gaines (1989), 46 Ohio St. 3d 65, 545 N.E. 2d 68, is applicable. Accordingly, I would reverse.

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Whorton
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 23, 1990
Citations: 51 Ohio St. 3d 121; 554 N.E.2d 1301; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 219; No. 88-2085
Docket Number: No. 88-2085
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In