State v. Whitlow
635 N.E.2d 383
Ohio
1994
Check Treatment

Mahoning County, No. 91 CA. 9. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and as a claimed appeal of right. This court denied appellant’s request for extension of time to file his memorandum in support of jurisdiction on May 31, 1994. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.