| W. Va. | Oct 26, 1909
L. W. White and Geneva Dunnigan were convicted of “Lewd and lascivious association and cohabitation together,” and on the 27th day of July, 1908, adjudged by the circuit court of Logan county to pay a ñne of fifty dollars each. To this judgment they obtained a writ of error and supersedeas on the 22nd of September, 1908.
The only question presented by the record is, whether or not the circuit court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict. This question depends upon whether or not the evidence is
Hie evidence, viewed most strongly against defendants, proves the following facts; viz: that L. W. White said he was going to build a house and get a woman from Dingess Run to keep house for him, and that after he got a divorce from his wife lie intended to marry this woman, but the witness to whom White made this statement did not recollect the name of the woman; that defendan'ts were not married to each other; that L. W. White is a married man not living with his wife, but not divorced from her; that Geneva Dunnigan is a single woman and the mother of a bastard child, then three years old; that L. W. White built a house and leased it to Geneva Dunnigan at $75.00 a year on the 28th of January, 1908, for the purpose of keeping boarders; that White and others boarded in the house with her; that the house had four rooms, to-wit, a dining room and kitchen, and two bed rooms in each of which were two beds; that White and the other male boarders occupied one of these rooms and Geneva Dunnigan, her child and the hired girl occupied the other; that just after the house was completed, the defendants, for about a week, occupied it together and alone; that thereafter there were other boarders there; that defendants were never seen at any time occupying the same room together, nor were any improper relations ever seen to exist between’ theml; that they were once seen to go to a show together in the day time; that White used to drive up the cows, carry in water, coal, kindling and victuals for Geneva, and that other boarders often did the same; that Geneva was sick for about a week after she first occupied the house. The evidence for the defense shows that for a week, or such length of time, after she first occupied the house Geneva had smallpox, and that this is the reason she did not have other boarders from the beginning. Courts should be slow to disturb the verdicts of juries depending solely on evidence. But in the present case there appears to be an entire lack of evidence to establish guilt. The greatest effect the evidence could possibly have would be to arouse a suspicion of guilt. It does not prove guilt; neither does it establish facts from which guilt could be reasonably inferred. Every fact proven is perfectly consistent with the good behavior of the defendants.
The evidence in the present case is not even as strong to establish guilt as it was in either of the cases above cited, and in both of those this Court held it insufficient. Following those cases, we must hold that the evidence in this case is not sufficient to prove guilt.
We will, therefore, reverse the judgment of the lower court, set aside the verdict and grant the plaintiffs in error a new trial, not because the verdict is contrary to the evidence, but because there is no appreciable evidence to establish guilt.
Reversed and Remanded.