State v. . Whisnant

May 16, 1923
Versions:185 N.C. 611
117 S.E. 390
1923 N.C. LEXIS 130
Pee Oueiam.

The defendants excepted to the court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the action, but the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exception is without merit. S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637; S. v. Jenkins, 182 N. C., 818; S. v. Killiam, 173 N. C., 792; S. v. Carlson, 171 N. C., 818.

No error.