History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Westfall
46 Ohio St. 2d 31
Ohio
1976
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This court finds the case of State v. Williamson (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 195, controlling.

*32In Williamson, at page 196, this court held:

“In our opinion, a defendant incarcerated in prison and acting without the aid of counsel filed his notice of appeal in time, if, within the * * * period specified * * * he delivers such notice to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court. In such a case, the jailer in effect represents the lower court * * *. We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139.”

In the case at bar, appellant filed his original notice of appeal with the Legal Officer of the Chillicothe Correctional Institute on July 18, 1975, well within the time for perfecting his appeal. Through no fáult of appellant, the notice of appeal was erroneously mailed to Lucas County. Therefore, appellant, who properly followed institution procedure, has filed his notice of appeal “in time” by delivering such notice “to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court.” Williamson, supra.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Westfall
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 21, 1976
Citation: 46 Ohio St. 2d 31
Docket Number: No. 75-773
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.