midpage

State v. WestfallState v. Westfall

Ohio Supreme Court
Apr 21, 1976
No. 75-773
Versions:46 Ohio St. 2d 31
346 N.E.2d 282
75 Ohio Op. 2d 97
1976 Ohio LEXIS 589
Per Curiam.

This court finds the case of State v. Williamson (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 195, controlling.

*32In Williamson, at page 196, this court held:

“In our opinion, a defendant incarcerated in prison and acting without the aid of counsel filed his notice of appeal in time, if, within the * * * period specified * * * he delivers such notice to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court. In such a case, the jailer in effect represents the lower court * * *. We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139.”

In the case at bar, appellant filed his original notice of appeal with the Legal Officer of the Chillicothe Correctional Institute on July 18, 1975, well within the time for perfecting his appeal. Through no fáult of appellant, the notice of appeal was erroneously mailed to Lucas County. Therefore, appellant, who properly followed institution procedure, has filed his notice of appeal “in time” by delivering such notice “to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court.” Williamson, supra.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Westfall
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 21, 1976
Citations: 46 Ohio St. 2d 31; 346 N.E.2d 282; 75 Ohio Op. 2d 97; 1976 Ohio LEXIS 589; No. 75-773
Docket Number: No. 75-773
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In