History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. West
136 La. 867
La.
1915
Check Treatment
PROVO STY, J.

The state has appealed from a judgment quashing the indictment against the accused, which indictment is under an ordinance or regulation of the State Board of Agriculture and Immigration, reading, as follows;

“In order to prevent the introduction of the dangerous citrus disease known as citrus canker; prevalent in the principal citrus growing states of the United States, but not found to be prevalent in Louisiana, the importation into this state of any and all kind's of citrus plants and parts of citrus plants from ¿11 the states of the United States, its territories and possessions and from all foreign countries, is hereby prohibited.”

The information against the accused is in strict conformity with this ordinance; that is to say, it does not charge that the citrus plants imported by the accused were diseased, but simply charges that they were imported.

When the state of Missouri sought to prohibit the driving or conveying of any Texas cattle into the state between certain dates, as a protection against Texas fever, the Supreme Court of the United States held the statute to be void as being an interference with interstate commerce. Railroad Co. v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465, 24 L. Ed. 527. For the same reason, the ordinance or' regulation, involved in this case is null.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed, and the accused is ordered released without day.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. West
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Feb 23, 1915
Citation: 136 La. 867
Docket Number: No. 21001
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.