45 Iowa 516 | Iowa | 1877
“Any citizen of the State except hotel-keepers, keepers of saloons, eating houses, grocery keepers and confectioners, is hereby permitted, within the county .of his residence) to buy and sell intoxicating liquor for mechanical, medicinal and sacramental purposes only, provided he shall first obtain permission from the board of supervisors of the county in which such business is to be conducted.”
The four sections following the said section provide for the manner of obtaining such permission. Other sections provide the manner of conducting the business. Others still, provide the grounds for which and the manner in which the permission may be declared vacated. Sec. 1540 provides that, “ if any person not holding such a permit, by himself, his clerk, servant or agent, shall, for himself or any person else, directly or indirectly, or under any pretense or by any device, sell to any person intoxicating liquor, he shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,” etc.
The defendant was not indicted under this section, but was indicted for the crime of nuisance. The theory of the District Court, we think, must have been that a person selling without a permit is subject to punishment only tinder said section 1540. Rut section 1543 provides that, “ in cases of violation of the provisions of either the three preceding sections * * * the building or erection of whatever kind, or the ground itself
We think that the District Court erred in its instructions, and that the case must be
Reversed.