History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Watson
562 N.W.2d 151
Wis.
1997
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided whether to affirm or reverse the order of the circuit court. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice William A. Bablitch and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley would affirm. Justice Jon P. Wilcox, Justice Janine P. Geske and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Donald W. Steinmetz did not participate.

¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule; declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue).

*283 ¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Watson
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: May 2, 1997
Citation: 562 N.W.2d 151
Docket Number: 95-1067
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In