History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Watlington
228 S.E.2d 457
| N.C. | 1976
|
Check Treatment
228 S.E.2d 457 (1976)
290 N.C. 666

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Joyce Marie WATLINGTON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 1, 1976.

A. Carl Penney, for defendant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Norma S. Harrell, Associate Atty., for the State.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, N.C.App., 226 S.E.2d 186. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Watlington
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 1, 1976
Citation: 228 S.E.2d 457
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.