State v. WarnerState v. Warner
- Reporters:
- ,
Defendant Keith Warner was charged by bill of information with the theft of property valued at $150,
*136No direct appeal lies from defendant’s conviction for possession of stolen property, a misdemeanor for which he was sentenced to serve six months’ imprisonment. See, La.Const.1974, Art. 5, § 5(D). However, we have considered defendant’s “appeal” in this case as an application for a supervisory writ, and hereby grant the writ in order to review the record as requested.
We have considered defendant’s assignment of error and find that it lacks merit. Furthermore, we have reviewed the record of pleadings and proceedings in both cases presented and have discovered no patent errors.
Accordingly, defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed.