State v. WalterState v. Walter
Feb 2, 1937
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Perskie, Dear, JJ. 7.
For reversal — Hetfield, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 5.