History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Wagner
101 Ohio St. 3d 183
Ohio
2004
Check Treatment

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the court of appeals. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446, at ¶ 20-22. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Wagner
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 3, 2004
Citation: 101 Ohio St. 3d 183
Docket Number: No. 2002-1808
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.