State v. Vincent
225 Conn. 917 | Conn. | 1993
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 249 (AC 10688), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the search war*918 rant application stated probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in not deciding (1) whether the seizure of the revolver, the subject of the prosecution, was ‘inadvertent’ under the ‘plain view’ exception to the warrant requirement, and (2) whether the Connecticut constitution requires ‘inadvertence’ under the ‘plain view’ exception even if the United States constitution does not?”