82 Iowa 397 | Iowa | 1891
I. The court gave an instruction to the jury in the following language: “2. The specific
II. It is next insisted that the court should have directed that the presence of the liquors in the building
IY. A witness, after the verdict, made affidavit that he did not understand a question asked him, and,
Y. The court directed the jury that in weighing the testimony of witnesses they should “consider their
The verdict is sufficiently supported by the evidence. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.