State v. Veney, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1423

Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed March 22, 2007:

“Whether a trial court must strictly comply with the requirement in Crim.R. 11(C) that it inform the defendant that by entering a plea, the defendant waives the right to have the state prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The conflict cases are State v. Scott (1996), 113 Ohio App.3d 401, State v. Cogar (Oct. 20, 1993), Summit App. No. CA-16234, and State v. Shinkle (Aug. 18, 1998), Scioto App. No. 98CA2560.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-0657, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Veney

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Jun 20, 2007

Citations: 114 Ohio St. 3d 1423; 868 N.E.2d 678; 2007-0656

Docket Number: 2007-0656

Court Abbreviation: Ohio