State v. VarrecchioState v. Varrecchio
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Comply
Defendant Ivas charged by bill of information with simple burglary in violation of
We have reviewed defendant’s assignment relating to the jury’s verdict and find it without merit. His conviction is therefore affirmed. However, we find that defendant’s commission of the present offense while on probation does not a lone support the trial court’s conclusion that “[t]here’s only one remedy for [this] situation . . . the longest confinement possible under the law.” Cf., La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.1(C); State v. Telsee, 425 So.2d 1251 (La.1983); State v. Jones, 398 So.2d 1049 (La.1981). Accordingly, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing in accord with the guidelines provided by Art. 894.1.
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE RE-/ MANDED. ’
LEMMON, J., concurs for the failure to comply with C.Cr.P. 894.1.