127 A. 545 | N.J. | 1925
The defendant, plaintiff in error, was indicted, tried and convicted in the Monmouth Quarter Sessions for unlawfully stealing an automobile and one tire tube, and for having received goods of like description, knowing them to be stolen, also for carrying concealed weapons. The conviction was carried to the Supreme Court on writ of error, and there affirmed. No deliverance of the Supreme Court is printed in the state of thecase, so we are not informed of the reasons upon which that tribunal affirmed the judgment.
There is no assignment of error in this court that the Supreme Court erred in affirming the judgment. In Burhans v.Paterson,
Another thing: More and different reasons for reversal are assigned in this court than were before the Supreme Court. This is unallowable. In State v. Snell,
For the reasons above stated there is nothing in the record for this court to pass upon, and the writ of error herein will be dismissed. *234