History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Vansickle
774 S.W.2d 583
Mo. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Mark Yansickle, appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his probation and sentencing him to six months in the St. Charles County Jail. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the charge against him nor the jurisdiction of the trial court. Other asserted errors, as here, in probation revocation proceedings must be challenged by a writ of habeas corpus not by a direct appeal. E.g. State v. Henderson, 750 S.W.2d 507, 516 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Morgan, 654 S.W.2d 326 (Mo.App.1983); Boyer v. State, 646 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1983).

An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The State’s motion to dismiss is granted. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Vansickle
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 15, 1989
Citation: 774 S.W.2d 583
Docket Number: No. 55171
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.