103 Iowa 6 | Iowa | 1897
The record is very voluminous, consisting of more than five hundred closely typewritten pages. A large number of errors are assigned, and we have examined the whole record with the care the importance of the case seems to demand.
IV. At the conclusion of the evidence, defendant’s counsel moved to strike out all the evidence of Hr. J. B. Horton, as to an autopsy held upon the body of Ora Van Tassel, the woman who it is claimed was murdered, and as to the examination and identification of certain organs of her body, because it was immaterial, irrelevant, and incompetent. The exact ground does not appear from the objection itself, and, upon turning to the argument, we find but little said in
These are the most important questions which arose during the trial over the reception and rejection of evidence. We have carefully considered all the objections made, however, and, without further extending this opinion, it is sufficient to say we discover no error.
The instruction as to motive or the want of it, audits effect upon the case, is complained of.- We need not set it out, as it is a clear and correct statement of the law.
'A careful examination of all of the instructions convinces us that there was no prejudicial error. On the contrary, they clearly and accurately state the law as applied to the facts shown in evidence, and were a complete and authentic guide to the jury in arriving at their verdict.
We have carefully examined the whole record, not only because of the importance of the case, but by reason of the fact that the crime charged was and is unnatural, and of the further fact that conviction was had largely upon the evidence of a detective whose methods are not to be commended. This examination convinces us that there was no prejudical error, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.