State v. Vallas

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 245, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-41d (7) and 51-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”

William G. Dow III, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided January 12, 1989

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Vallas

Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date Published: Jan 12, 1989

Citation: 210 Conn. 803

Court Abbreviation: Conn.