State v. UqdahState v. Uqdah
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Kliebert
Defendant, Frank Uqdah, was charged by bill of information with simple robbery, a violation of
The maximum sentence which may be imposed under
The record does not contain a bill of information charging the defendant as a multiple offender. A habitual offender bill of information does not charge a new crime but is only a method of increasing the punishment of second and subsequent felony offenses. State v. Walker, 416 So.2d 534, 536 (La.1982). In order to sentence defendant as a multiple offender under the Habitual Offender Law, it is essential that former convictions be formally charged. State v. Hingle, 139 So.2d 205 (La.1962); State v. Donahue, 572 So.2d 255 (1st Cir.1990). Since there is no multiple offender bill of information, the prior conviction cannot be used to enhance the sentence for the present conviction. Because the sentence imposed of eight and one-half years is greater than the maximum sentence allowable for a first time offender, we must vacate his sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing.
Accordingly, for the reasons assigned, defendant’s sentence is vacated and the matter remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing.
SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED.
Notes
. See