History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Tusha
354 Mont. 63
Mont.
2009
Check Treatment

On March 12, 2009, the defendant was sentenced, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol-Fourth or Subsequent Offense, a felony. The Defendant shall not be eligible for parole until he successfully completes chemical dependency treatment.

On August 6, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Steve Eschenbacher. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District *64Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of August, 2009.

DATED this 20th day of August, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Tusha
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 6, 2009
Citation: 354 Mont. 63
Docket Number: CAUSE NO. DC-07-136
Court Abbreviation: Mont.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.