State v. . Turpin

Jun 15, 1932
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Stacy
Stacy, C. J.

The evidence respecting the reputation ‍‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‍of defendant’s garage for selling liquor was hearsay and should have been excluded. S. ‍‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‍v. Springs, 184 N. C., 768, 114 S. E., 851; S. v. Mills, 184 N. C., 694, 114 ‍‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‍S. E., 314. The identical question was before the Court in the ‍‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‍two cases just cited. Further discussion would only call for a repetition of ‍‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‍what was said in these cases.

New trial.