54 Kan. 513 | Kan. | 1895
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The defendant was prosecuted upon an information which charged that on March 3, 1894, he feloni
A more serious objection is urged against the verdict. The information contained a single count, which charged burglary in the first degree and larceny in a dwelling house. The verdict returned by the jury was fatally defective in failing.to specify the degree of burglary of which they found the defendant guilty. He was charged with burglary in the first degree, under §61 of the crimes act, and the jury might under