139 P. 863 | Utah | 1914
The defendant was convicted of larceny, stealing a cow. He appeals. He urges the evidence is insufficient to sustain .the verdict, to connect him with the commission of the offense. Without setting forth even a substance of the evidence, let it suffice by saying that, a review of the record shows ample evidence to support the verdict. We shall refer only to such portions of the evidence as will illustrate other assignments.
In their brief counsel say “there are other errors assigned, but they are of minor importance.” Nothing more is said about them. There does not seem to be much to this appeal.
Let the judgment be reaffirmed. Such is the order.