History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Thompson
66 Or. App. 496
Or. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

The trial court’s order finding defendant to be in contempt is inadequate in that it does not identify the statutory basis upon which it is entered. Accordingly, we cannot determine if it was proper.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.1

On remand, the trial court may wish to consider, inter alia, the impact such decisions as SER Spencer v. Howe, 281 Or 599, 576 P2d 4 (1978), have on the procedures that must be followed (and the punishment that can he imposed) with respect to conduct like that of defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Thompson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jan 11, 1984
Citation: 66 Or. App. 496
Docket Number: 30217; CA A29258
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.