595 P.2d 842 | Or. Ct. App. | 1979
The state appeals the dismissal of a complaint charging defendant with assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160. The complaint alleges in pertinent part that defendant "did unlawfully and knowingly cause physical injury to [complainant] by striking [complainant] in the face * * *.” Dismissal of the complaint followed the state’s refusal to plead further after the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer, with leave to amend, on the ground that it was not definite and certain enough to enable defendant to make his defense.
Defendant contended that the complaint was defective because it failed to specify what injuries, if any, complainant suffered during the alleged altercation. The demurrer was filed two months after arraignment, at which defendant entered a plea of not guilty.
The state contends as a preliminary matter that the demurrer grounded on lack of definiteness and certainty was not timely filed and therefore should.not have been entertained, absent exceptional circumstances. ORS 135.610(1).
Nevertheless, the complaint is sufficiently definite and certain to withstand a demurrer. The "definite
Reversed and remanded for trial.
ORS 135.610(1) provides:
"The demurrer shall be entered either at the time of the arraignment or at such other time as may be allowed to the defendant for that purpose.”