History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Thompson
158 A.2d 333
| N.J. | 1960
|
Check Treatment
31 N.J. 540 (1960)
158 A.2d 333

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM G. THOMPSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 9, 1960.
Decided February 22, 1960.

*541 Mr. Archibald Kreiger argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. John G. Thevos, attorney; Mr. Edward J. Wolak, of counsel).

Mr. Albert G. Besser argued the cause for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion filed by Judge Sullivan in the court below, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Mr. Justice HALL and Mr. Justice SCHETTINO vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Foley in the court below.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR — 5.

For affirmance — Justices HALL and SCHETTINO — 2.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Thompson
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 22, 1960
Citation: 158 A.2d 333
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.