State v. Then
119 N.J.L. 429
N.J.1938Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.