State v. Then
119 N.J.L. 429
| N.J. | 1938

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.