State v. Suckow
120 N.J.L. 190 | N.J. | 1938
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Pekskie, Poetee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Walked, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.