History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Stroud
353 N.C. 524
N.C.
2001
Check Treatment

ORDER

After carefully considering defendant’s pro se motion requesting that this Court void a previously filed petition for writ of certiorari, it appears to the Court that defendant is attempting to represent himself despite being currently represented by court-appointed counsel. Therefore, we dismiss the pro se filing.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of June, 2001.

s/ G.K. Butterfield. Jr.. J.

For the Court

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Stroud
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 7, 2001
Citation: 353 N.C. 524
Docket Number: No. 165A95-3
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.