midpage

State v. StraughnState v. Straughn

Ohio Supreme Court
Jul 5, 2006
2005-0585
Versions:110 Ohio St. 3d 1413
850 N.E.2d 73
2006-Ohio-3306

Hamilton App. No. C-040093. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The order affirming the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated. The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that modified the defendant’s sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Straughn
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 5, 2006
Citations: 110 Ohio St. 3d 1413; 850 N.E.2d 73; 2006-Ohio-3306; 2005-0585
Docket Number: 2005-0585
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In